Why the Engagement Letter Matters
The engagement letter (also called "retainer agreement" or "fee agreement") is the contract between you and your bankruptcy attorney. It is the document that defines:
- Exactly what work the attorney will do for you
- How much you pay, when, and to whom
- What happens if something changes (conversion, dismissal, adversary, contested matter)
- What services are excluded and require an additional fee
Key principle: The engagement letter is the best evidence of what you actually agreed to. If a dispute arises later about scope, fees, or duty, the written document controls - not verbal assurances.
The same letter is also the evidence used by the court and the U.S. Trustee under Rule 2016(b) to evaluate whether the attorney's Section 329(a) disclosure matches reality.
Section 1 - Basic Terms (Must Be in Writing)
Section 2 - Scope of Services
This is the most important section to read carefully. An ambiguous scope is how attorneys later justify charging extra fees.
Common trap: "Scope of representation includes all matters necessary to conclude the bankruptcy case." This phrasing is so broad it means nothing - and it lets the attorney later define "necessary" however they want. Ask for specific scope.
Section 3 - Fees and Payment
Under Rule 2016(b), your attorney must file a statement of compensation with the court disclosing the fee arrangement. Ask for a copy of what they intend to file.
Section 4 - Source of Payment
All of these must be disclosed to the court. See the Rule 2016(b) red flags checklist for how these issues play out downstream.
Section 5 - Conflicts of Interest
Section 6 - Communication and Staffing
Section 7 - Termination and Withdrawal
Section 8 - Dispute Resolution and Fee Review
Red flag: If an engagement letter contains a clause preventing you from challenging fees in the bankruptcy court or disclosing them to the UST, that clause is not enforceable. But the presence of such a clause tells you something about the attorney's posture.
Section 9 - Specific Subchapter V Considerations
If the case is a Subchapter V small-business reorganization, additional items should appear:
Red Flags Summary
Walk away (or ask serious questions) if any of these appear:
- Scope described only in general terms, no specific services listed
- Attorney refuses to put additional assurances in writing
- Fee quoted verbally as "around" or "approximately" a number, not in writing
- No clear explanation of what happens on dismissal or conversion
- Arbitration clause that waives court oversight
- Clause prohibiting disclosure of fees to the UST or court
- Payment required to a non-attorney entity or third party
- No mention of Rule 2016(b) disclosure
- "Fee is non-refundable regardless of outcome" language without exception
- Engagement letter not signed by the specific attorney who will represent you
If You Already Signed an Engagement Letter
If you are already in a case and have concerns about the engagement letter, you still have options:
- Request a copy if you do not have one. Attorneys must provide clients with copies of engagement agreements on request.
- Review against what was disclosed to the court under Rule 2016(b). Discrepancies may be actionable.
- Request itemized billing for all work performed. You are entitled to a detailed accounting.
- Consult an independent attorney about fee reasonableness. A second opinion is often available for a fixed consultation fee.
- Contact the U.S. Trustee if the arrangement involves undisclosed terms, excessive fees, or conflicts of interest.
- File a Section 329(b) motion through independent counsel, or request Rule 2017 sua sponte review by the court.